Love on Trial: The case that exposed India’s delusional conception of "love"
Words by Pradyun Krishnan
Welcome to the Brown History Newsletter. If you’re enjoying this labour of love, please do consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your contribution would help pay the writers and illustrators and support this weekly publication. If you like to submit a writing piece, please send me a pitch by email at brownhistory1947@gmail.com. Check out our SHOP and our Podcast. You can also follow us on Instagram and Twitter.
Love on Trial: The case that exposed India’s delusional conception of "love"
I. Introduction
Pyaar, mohabbat, ishq, prem – India's linguistic abundance of words for love speaks to a national obsession that runs deep. From the soaring melodies of Bollywood ballads to the passionate poetry in Shayaris and the Vedas. Love stories have long been steeped in India’s cultural and social fabric, whether that be the classic tale of Laila-Majnu or the pop-culture emblem DDLJ. In many ways, the Subcontinent’s history is a tale of love itself. Nowhere was this more evident than in the sensational Nanavati trial that changed India’s legal history and forced the nation to confront the darker side of its passion for love. The impact of the Nanavati case on Indian judicial history cannot be overstated. It was a pivotal moment that led to significant changes in the Indian legal system. One of the major outcomes of the case was the abolition of the Jury system, which had been in place since the British colonial era. The case also brought to light the undue influence of the entertainment industry and media on India’s judicial system, leading to stricter guidelines for media coverage of court proceedings. The Nanavati case remains a landmark in Indian legal history, shaping the way justice is delivered in the country.
Case:
Kawas Nanavati, a high ranking Indian Naval Commander, who was married to a British woman, Slyvia Nanavati. The couple had three children and often moved around the country but eventually relocated to Bombay in 1959. Given his occupation, Nanavati was often out on sea leaving his wife and children behind in Bombay. Prem Ahuja, an automobile business owner, developed a friendship with Slyvia which later transformed into an illicit relationship. On April 27, 1959, Nanavati returned from another long voyage and noticed his wife seemed distant. Soon after the confrontation, Slyvia confessed to her affair with Ahuja. On April 27, 1959, Nanavati took Slyvia and the children to the cinema and left. Under false pretenses the commander then retrieved his revolver from his ship and drove to Ahuja’s flat. Nanavati allegedly asked Ahuja about his plans for his wife and children, when he did not receive an honorable or desirable answer, Kawas Nanavati fired three shots and killed Prem Ahuja. He then drove to the nearest police station and confessed to the crime. The case “Nanavati V State of Maharashtra” ensued with a trial by jury. This would be one of the last cases to ever use a jury in India.